Suchergebnisse

Míg a populizmus korábban csak a szélsőséges pártokra volt jellemző, addigra mostanra általánossá vált, hogy számos ország belpolitikájának alkotják meghatározó elemét. A szakirodalomból azonban nem egyértelmű, hogy mely tényezők vezettek el ezeknek a pártoknak a megerősödéséhez, részben az eltérő minták és eltérő becslési eljárások miatt. A tanulmány három csoportra bontja azokat a változókat, amelyek befolyással vannak a populista pártok térnyerésére: gazdasági okok; bizalmon alapuló változók; kulturális tényezők. A tanulmány arra a következtetésre jut, hogy a regionális és választói heterogenitás miatt nehezen hasonlíthatók össze az adatok, emiatt kontinenseken átívelő panel adatokra lenne szükség, hogy általános ok-okozati kapcsolatot lehessen alkotni a populizmus térnyerésének okairól. = While populism in the past was associated mainly with radical parties, by today they have become a part of the political mainstream in many countries. However, looking at the literature it is unclear what factors have led the rise in populist demand. A problem when trying to understand the causal relationship is, that large econometric analyses which were conducted over the past 5 years use different samples and measurement methods. This article will investigate three groups of reasons which may have led to the increase in populist demand: economic reasons; trust reasons and cultural factors. The article finds that because of regional and electoral heterogeneity it is not really possible to compare data from Europe with that of the USA, therefore before any general conclusions can be drawn it would be useful to have panel data across continents.

AbstractIn the past decade, the East‐Central European countries were provided significant external capacity building assistance to help their emergence as donors of foreign aid. This paper aims to map these capacity development programmes and identify where they have helped and what challenges remain for the new donors. The main conclusion is that although capacity building has been instrumental in building organisational structures, working procedures and training staff, deeper underlying problems such as low levels of financing, lacking political will, the need for visibility and low staff numbers continue to hinder the new international development policies. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AbstractThe article analyses why asylum‐seekers choose Hungary as an entry point to the European Union. Among the Central and Eastern European countries Hungary has been by far the most popular choice for asylum‐seekers between 2002 and 2016, yet surprisingly, it has been neglected by the literature. Using a panel dataset and fixed effects regressions, the article finds that beyond being 'conveniently' located on the Balkans migration route, variables related to Hungary's immigration policy are the most significant determinants of asylum‐seeker choices. The article finds no evidence to support recent claims by the Hungarian government that arrivals to the country are actually economic migrants and not asylum‐seekers; quite the contrary, the results indicate that on average asylum‐seekers entering Hungary are fleeing violent conflict in their countries of origin.